Showing posts with label Russia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Russia. Show all posts

Sunday, 8 November 2015

Когда хлеб привезут? В понедельник. Сегодня суббота...

Есть у меня маленькая отдушина в моём непростом деле материнства - по утрам (это всё, конечно, с разрешения Малыша) - смотрю документалистику ВГТРК "Россия Культура". Там есть цикл передач, который мне очень нравится: "Письма из провинции". Дело в том, что я та еще деревенщина - с двух лет меня мама отвозила с мая по сентябрь на попечение бабушки в глухие места Вологодской области. 


Я так её люблю с тех пор, мою Вологодчину. И север русский люблю. И Василия Белова, Александра Яшина, Николая Рубцова, Федора Абрамова-моего земляка, Виктора Астафьева, Сергея Личутина, Бориса Можаева, Валентина Распутина, в общем, долго тут можно перечислять Люблю. Скучаю. Томлюсь. 

фото

Перед самой судьбоносной встречей с супругом моим даже была у меня мысль переехать в деревню, пойти работать учительницей.  А что, подъёмные давали неплохие - телега дров, телёнок на выкорм, или поросёнок молочный или курей, никакого насилия, всё по желанию, конечно. До сих пор думаю, если что, на пенсии в Сибирь, в Томск махну! Домик куплю, свеклы насажаю. Вот вы смеётесь, а где оно счастье? В чем оно?


Так вот, вы знаете, кто такие вепсы? 
В цикле "Письма из провинции" есть передача "Деревня Пондала". Она расположена в Бабаевском районе Вологодской области: "Сюда не идут поезда, и даже на автомобиле добраться до вологодских вепсов довольно сложно. Некоторых деревень нет ни на одной карте. Ощущение, что попадаешь в другую страну. Ведь здесь все говорят только на вепсском языке: 


"Leibän konz homen todas? Ezmärgen. Tämbei sobat. Leibäd todas ezmärgen"

("Когда хлеб привезут? В понедельник. Сегодня суббота. Хлеб привезут в понедельник")"

 

Пондала – одна из самых маленьких деревень этого края. Здесь проживает всего 36 человек. В основном, это люди старшего поколения. "Молодые приехали бы и переехали бы. 40-45 лет, в таком возрасте они приехали бы. Даже жильё тут есть, рабочих мест тут нет", - говорит житель деревни Пондала Вера Феклина.


Такая же ситуация и в соседних сёлах. Общее количество жителей Вепсского национального поселения – чуть более тысячи двухсот человек. Около 300 из них уже поменяли деревенскую глубинку на город. Причина та же: нехватка рабочих мест, низкий доход. "Голод, как говорится, ощущается, иной раз с трудом можно найти и продавца, с трудом можно найти в котельную кого-то. Дело в том, что зарплата отличается у нас здесь от городской. Если на железной дороге зарплата помощника машиниста от 30 до 50 тысяч, машиниста от 50 до 70, у нас здесь в сельском хозяйстве вообще, например, тысяч пять. И они не вовремя получают зарплату", - сетует глава Вепсского национального поселения Лариса Иванова.

В деревне Пондала всего семь рабочих мест. Кроме магазина, здесь есть деревенский клуб, музей вепсской культуры, медицинский пункт. Почтовое отделение работает прямо на дому. Почтальон и специалист по обслуживанию в одном лице, Галина Прохорова знает, что больше всего беспокоит односельчан: "Люди просят сотовую связь. Им нужна сотовая связь. Потому, что не у всех есть телефоны такие, стационарные. У всех дети, родственники в городе, с сотовой связью можно было бы общаться, она, действительно, нужна".

Отдалённость от города, плохие дороги, отсутствие сотовой связи и Интернета. Оказывается, во всём этом можно найти и положительные моменты. Как известно, благодаря именно такому образу жизни вологодские вепсы сохранили по сей день самобытную культуру и свой родной язык. источник

И вот сижу я, смотрю на бабушек, которые в деревне остались, на камеру про трудодни и украденные колоски рассказывают, и думаю, скоро ведь и их не будет. И нашей деревни, детства моего почти уже нет. И пропадет, исчезнет с лица земли еще одна из тысяч подобных. Ещё одна маленькая народность. И язык их, прекрасный, загадочный язык исчезнет... 


Наверное, так всегда люди жили, забывали прошлое. Смотрели только вперед. Да?


Copyright © 2015 by Olga Johannesson 

Saturday, 28 February 2015

in the driver´s seat

As a mother of two - one baby and one toddler -  I am always on the wheels: prams, all sorts of strollers, tricycles, what not, and most often, of course, I am using our car. 
It´s interesting how we get used to the cars - in a way it becomes our second home - a personal space which we keep clean or fill with all sorts of personal indispensable garbage, a small reflection of our home.
Last week I passed a driving test second time in my life and remembered the cars and experiences I had. 

On the photo: one of the rare Reykjavik traffic jams in Buðstaðavegur 
My relationships with an automobile started long ago: I got my first driving license in 2000 but actually started to drive my own car only seven years later.

I cannot remember now for what reason whatsoever I decided I needed a driving license in that hot summer fifteen years ago. Still a student, with no perspective of obtaining a moving vehicle of any type or condition at all, I had absolutely no necessity to start learning to drive a car. And despite all the human logic I entered a driving school in June and started the process.

If my memory does not fail me it was the only driving school in Arkhangelsk at the time (my native city in the North Western Russia). The class comprised about three dozen of men, representing all walks of live and three young women.

They made the school from the remnants of a bankrupt military or paramilitary organisation (I think it was something to do with DOSAAF ) - the transformation scheme so familiar and rather common for the wild Russian nineties. All of those so-to-say "teachers" were retired colonels and majors in their late fifties-sixties with no experience of actually what can be called teaching. They were loud and disrespectful with the male learners, awkward, uneasy and sweaty with us, pretty and young. And to make it more difficult for them it was a hot summer that year.

Anyway, every Tuesday and Thursday, six to nine, we were there - in a stuffy room with high ceilings of a stalin-time building and dark green walls ornamented with with soviet tanks pictures and posters instructing on five slunk positions of a gas-mask. The walls adorned by the occasional white crater of a dry broken paint, our studies crawled with the snail speed under the monotonous voice of the teacher.

The driving classes were, however, the fun in its essence. I am not joking. My driving instructor was a perl, a find which I have been remembering warmly with a smile for already fifteen years. He was one on those retired as well. In contrast to the classroom shabby guys, mostly political (propaganda) commissars in their past, that one had been a pilot. But... he had a peculiarity uncombinable with piloting - the thing was, let me put it mildly, he often found himself "thirsty". On some days more thirsty than on the others, sometimes even so thirsty that it took weeks to quench the thirst. Understandably, that avocation moved him out of the brave pilots´ regiment, consequently, out of  heartbreakers´ cavalry and set him into the driving instructor´s seat.

On quite some occasions I could distinctly smell his last night moral laps in the dilapidated synthetic interior. But what was interesting about him - he talked. He talked nonstop. It was only comparable to the Northern Korean radio (I could only assume) - radio with no music, no commercials - just monotonous talking. For sixty minutes he elaborated on his past, present and his versions of future, he dwelt upon politics, presidents, resurrection of Christ and chicken farms, reincarnation of frogs, of planes, of women. In a way it was amusing. In those days I learned what was a glide-slope track for the rest of my life.

His working horse, his Sleipnir and my first car was a red Lada 3. Once bright and attractive with scarlet lipstick, cheap perm in the hair, lots of makeup and rather gaudy outfit, with all her ostentatious looks aiming at attracting sailors and salesmen. That girl became old, alone and forgotten quite fast and then was picked up by my old drunkard, once a fearless pilot and a heartbreaker. If you think of that, they actually made quite a couple, those two.

Lada by large had problems with her health: coughing and rattling sounds of the engine were the least to worry about. The old broad had a hard steering with no hydraulics which I had to put all my weight to make a timely turn. At my first class I was warned that in case the brakes failed, I had to use the hand brake. The transmission lever worked every other time, which to say no more, fell off completely at the exam. Still I passed it. We passed it. Sometimes I wonder what happened with those two.

Seven years later I bought my first car, a silver Opel Corsa D, and, while expecting it from Germany, called another driving instructor to refresh driving techniques long forgotten by that time.
Sergei was a retired traffic policeman who was unofficially giving driving classes to the needy and then using his contacts in the appropriate institution to help the student to ensure he passed. It required minimum hours of driving and an immoderate gratification.

Having already had driving license I clearly bore no interest for him as a client. Of his interests I cannot say much. I remember the man had a young wife and most of the time he spent of the phone talking to her, continuously questioning her geolocation, where subsequently we would drive to prove her wrong. Apparently the woman was very bad with directions. On some days she would not pick up, and then, after finding some sad rock on the radio in quiet melancholy we would drive to the hardware shop, where he would buy planks of wood, nails, screws, roofing felt and the like. He was building a house.

My Opel became my friend, my company, my girl for the next four years. She was young, honest, hardworking, a bit fancy, compact and fast. I took care of her, she took care of me on all sorts of the roads. In the cold harsh winters she never failed me, starting from half a turn of an ignition key after spending several nights outside in -36C, under the pained watch of the neighbours when their Toyotas and Fords were being taken by the tow-tracks.

Iceland, the country of ice and fire, put me into a dark blue Skoda Octavia station. I mention the colour intentionally as then I was fully sure it was the most boring car colour. I slammed the door and felt my fancy single youth days were over. Quite fast somehow I became a mother of two. In return the car immediately impregnated itself with two baby seats. I cut my hair and filled the wardrobe with colours which hid the traces of burping and dried formula. Suddenly blue did not seem that bad anymore. Again I was in the driver´s seat but on a rather different road - quiet stable middle class life with a big family.

Thinking of that, now I believe this type of a car could have been designed specially for Iceland, an outdoor family country. When we travel with two kids to my in-laws to the North, we take a pram and a stroller, feeding chair, four bags, a suitcase, and a huge pumped gymnastic ball (an indispensable parental item). Packing all that I usually think we would have managed to put a sheep there, provided we had any.

I know I was not perfect driving my Skoda - out of the most outrageous manifestation of stupidity I backed into the pillar at the Rekstravörur - a wholesale warehouse in Reykjavik. And as painful as it was, there was absolutely no necessity to park backwards out of two main reasons: I had never done it before because I could have not been able to (proved myself right though) and I had an intention to buy two huge boxes of stuff and loads of paper towels, which, no doubt, would have been only normal to park the car with an accessible trunk. But no. I pressed gently into the pole, made a dent, broke the paint on the rear bumper and with shaking hands entered the store. It took days, no, weeks to come clean with my husband, but he is a good man.

A month ago I decided to stop my lengthy violation of the Icelandic law and change the driving license. This statement needs an elaboration: as my husband took a woman from an exotic country outside the boarders of EEA, among other disturbances, her driving license was valid only for 90 days. Apparently, something was expected to happen to those people upon the expiry. Blindness?

Anyway, I took it. It was my second driving test fifteen years after the first one. Everything was different. More to say, everything was the opposite: I took it in the shiny white brand new Mercedes Benz C220 with the 250 kilometers of milage. I don´t know whether it was the composed and calm instructor or the horror of hundred thousands of euro scratch that pushed me through it with no mistakes, but let me tell you, thanks to them finally one thing I learnt very well - parking backwards.



Copyright © 2015 by Olga Johannesson 

Sunday, 15 June 2014

Книжная полка: Евгений Богданов и его "Поморы"

      "Про наш Архангельский край столько всякой неправды да напраслины говорят, что придумал я сказать все, как есть у нас. Всю сущу правду, что ни скажу - все правда. Кругом земляки, соврать не дадут. К примеру, река наша Двина в узком месте тридцать пять верст, а в широком - шире моря. А ездили по ней на льдинах вечных. У нас и ледяники есть. Таки люди, которы ледяным промыслом живут. Льдины с моря гонят да дают в прокат, кому желательно..."

Так писал известный северный сказочник Степан Писахов о суровом поморском крае - шутками-прибаутками, но сказка ложь, да в ней намек, так и жили поморы - традиционное древнее свободное население побережья студеного Белого моря, - а сказка, шутка, присказка только и помогала им преодолевать безжалостную стихию, смягчала неласковую северную погоду, помогала выжить на море и на суше.

Немного написано в нашей литературе о поморах. В основном память приносит имена Марфы-сказочницы (Марфы Семеновны Крюковой) с побережья Зимней Золотицы, Степана Писахова, Бориса Шергина. Мало кто знает о Евгении Федоровиче Богданове - писателе, посвятившем свое творчество описанию скромного северного поморского края.

источник фото  Поморы на промысле в Белом море

Роман-сага Евгения Федоровича Богданова "Поморы" представляет собой цикл произведений, состоящий из трех самостоятельных романов ("Поморы", "Берег розовой чайки", "Прощайте, паруса"), объединенных героями, местом действия и единой временной цепочкой повествования, начинающейся в 1930-е годы и заканчивающейся в конце 1970-х - начале 80-х годов. 

Основное действие происходит на побережье Белого моря в деревне Унда, обычном старинном северном рыбацком поселке, которых, к сожалению, так мало осталось в наши дни. Главные герои произведения - поморы - жители деревни, прозванные так по старинному обычаю величать древние свободные племена, селившиеся по берегам студеного Белого моря. 


источник фото   Поморы на зимнем промысле утельги - тюленей

Как видно, роман охватывает довольно большой временной период: автор начинает повествование от коллективизации ("Поморы"), проводит своих героев через войну и трудные послевоенные годы ("Берег розовой чайки") и заканчивает семидесятыми годами ("Прощайте, паруса").  

Каждый роман, каждый временной отрезок, описываемый в романе, имеет свою ярко выраженную тематическую проблематику - так, например, в романе "Поморы" рыбаки решают нелегкую для себя задачу о вступлении в рыболовецкий колхоз, красочно описывается старинный парусный способ лова рыбы, опасные многодневные экспедиции по забою тюленей, ручной тяжелый способ работы, трудные условия, ненадежный, утлый примитивный парусный флот. 
В романе "Берег розовой чайки" две линии повествования: первая - это жизнь рыбаков, главным образом рыбачек в военные годы, которые в отсутствие мужчин выполняли всю самую сложную мужскую работу, и вторая - фронтовая, где описываются военные будни их мужей и сыновей. 
Роман "Прощайте, паруса" посвящен болезненному для традиционного многовекового рыбацкого хозяйства переходу на машинный флот, на траулеры в море и вертолеты при заготовке шкур и мяса тюленей. 

В общем, этот цикл произведений напоминает уже довольно известные и некоторые экранизированные произведения о советском крестьянстве - например, роман Георгия Маркова "Строговы", цикл произведений Василия Белова, начинающийся романом "Кануны", романы Анатолия Иванова "Тени исчезают в полдень", "Вечный зов", роман Вячеслава Шишкова "Угрюм-река" и другие. Однако уникальная северная рыбацкая специфика, с любовью описанная автором суровая северная природа, тяжелый северный морской рыболовный промысел, переданный личный опыт, личные впечатления автора о родной своей северной земле поморской - все это делает цикл романов "Поморы" заметным среди подобных. 

Как известно, автор - Евгений Богданов - писатель-самоучка, писал о своем северном быте, о своем народе. Поэтому, мне показалось, что первая часть ("Поморы") намного слабее написана по сравнению со второй и третьей частями трилогии. Как раз до "Поморов" я читала о страшном для крестьянства периоде коллективизации в романе  "Час шестый" Василия Белова. По сравнению с другими произведениями, по сравнению с рассказами моей бабушки лично пережившей все ужасы и несправедливости этого фатального для русского крестьянства периода в северной вологодской деревне, Евгений Богданов описывает этот период в ярких утрированных красках, типичных, к сожалению, для литературы советского реализма эпохи застоя, сознательно упрощая характеры, примитивно мотивируя поступки героев. 

Это, пожалуй, единственный недостаток романов. В целом, это интересный, красочно описаный экскурс в историю моего родного архангельского края, погружение в поморский рыбацкий сельский быт начала века, своего рода единение с предками, что не может не быть всегда позитивным и познавательным опытом.

Еще хочу сказать пару слов о другой книге Евгения Богданова - сборнике из девяти рассказов "Когда отцветают травы".

Каждый из них - это чудесное самостоятельное произведение, капелька утренней росы еле колышащаяся на невидимой серебристой паутинке между веточами ивняка, скромно притаившегося на окраине туманного утреннего поля, где-то в самой глуши северных, архангельских земель.

источник фото Борис Студенцов "Северная деревня" (2002)
Рассказы написаны о деревне, про деревню, про деревенских, простых людей (за исключением, пожалуй, только "Рубиновых серег" - это рассказ о войне). Рассказы с простым сюжетом, о простой, но удивительно мудрой, расставляющей все по своим местам жизни простых людей ("На северной дороге", "Время сплава").

Здесь нет закрученных психологических сюжетов, нет типичных ярких характеров, нет надрыва: пожалуй, вся проза Евгения Богданова как северное лето:

"Наше скромное, неяркое северное лето вначале часто бывает дождливым и холодным. С востока непрестанно дуют резкие ветры с дождями и изморосью. Но иногда в июне вдруг установится хорошая погода. Южные ветры то очищают небо до праздничного блеска, то приносят грозовые дожди, короткие и шумные. Поля и перелески обильно зеленеют, травы становятся сочными, а воздух, влажный, согретый солнцем, обволакивает все своим ласковым дыханием."

Природа описана автором замачательно - только тот, кто родился и вырос на этих северных просторах, красотах Каргопольского края, кто впитал с молоком матери понимание земли родной, только тот так просто и красиво может описать родную, неброскую, северную скромную красавицу, труженицу-землю. О ней, о простых трудолюбивых людях, населяющих её пишет Евгений Федорович.

"Это — край неброских пейзажей, задумчивой тишины, край славных людей, искренних, простых и трудолюбивых. Тихие лесные речушки, молчаливые ельники, низинные луга и болотца с кочками, поросшими осокой, небольшие косоугольники полей на склонах холмов, пыльные большаки и старинные села, — всё это имеет особую прелесть."

Проза Евгения Федоровича Богданова проста. Она тонко касается потаенных уголков в душе каждого читателя, способного чувствовать, сопереживать, и самостоятельно, согласно своему внутреннему сокровенному мерилу интуитивно определять добро и зло.

Итак, если вы устали от выматывающей повседневности, и дни сменяются со скоростью вам уже неподвластной - почитайте Богданова. Его проза проста, в чем то, по сегодняшнему дню, немного наивна, но добра, ясна, светла и утверждает вечные человеческие ценности - добро, простоту, чистоту, верность и любовь.


Copyright © 2014 by Olga Johannesson

Friday, 11 April 2014

Книжная полка: Борис Балтер "До свидания, мальчики!"

"Я не знаю, в чем моя вина. Очевидно, в том, что я человек и поэтому отвечаю перед своей совестью за все подлости и преступления, совершаемые на земле." 
Борис Балтер

Я много читала о войне, я читала Васильева, Гроссмана, Никулина, Быкова, Шолохова, Леонова, Пикуля, Глушко, и других. Я знаю как тяжело, невозможно, больно бывает читать о правду о войне, о человеческих судьбах. Эта книга не о войне, она о мирной жизни трех мальчишек южного курортного городка - об одном последнем беззаботном лете, о первой любви, но читаешь, а сердце сжимается от предчувствия неотвратимости горя, излома.
Повесть неоднократно выходила в издательстве "Детская литература", но она не про детей - эта книга про жизнь, про судьбу, про потери, хотя нет там про них ни слова...
обложка первого издания
В 1961 году Борис Балтер пишет лирическую повесть "Трое из одного города", повесть в немалой степени автобиографическая, что подтверждают лирические отступления в тексте от имени самого автора. В последствии повесть получила свое название по строчке из песни Булата Окуджавы.

Речь идет о трех друзьях - мальчишках-выпускниках школы на пути во взрослую жизнь и трех их подружках. Действие происходит в маленьком морском курортном городке. Время действия - конец тридцатых годов двадцатого века. Произведение написано от первого лица, лирический герой - сам автор в юности.

И вроде бы ничего особенного там не происходит - ну ничего такого, чего бы не происходило с миллионами подростков по всему миру - купаются, влюбляются, учатся, пробуют первую папиросу, первый стакан дешевого кислого вина, первый раз держат бритву, первый раз целуются. Даже и войны нет в этом произведении. Школа, прополка, пляж, курортники...

Но есть в тексте пара таких лирических отступлений автора уже в возрасте написания произведения от которых замирает (нет-нет, не сердце! это ж не только о любви там первой-романтической) замирает вся ваша суть - вы как бы "зависаете", останавливаетесь на мгновение и осознаете, физически осознаете, ощущаете жизнь. И это мгновение, эта грустная откровенность автора настолько ценна, настолько необходима, и дает такой резкий фон для всего произведения, что читаете вы дальше как бы в состоянии этого осознания, в физическом ощущении неизбежности, упрямой ржавой, железной линии жизни, которая согнет, сломает зеленый наивный росток...

"Пока я пробивался к подножке, меня трогали за плечи, желали счастливого пути, кто-то поцеловал – кажется, тетя Настя. Вагон вздрогнул, я встал на подножку и тогда увидел маму. Она шла от головы поезда. Она, наверно, понимала, что опаздывает, и потому шла от головы, чтобы не пропустить мой вагон. Поезд медленно катился, и слышно было, как буксовал паровоз. Я спрыгнул на перрон и побежал навстречу маме. В толпе не так-то легко было ее найти. Мы столкнулись неожиданно и обнялись. Мимо катился мой вагон. Сашка с Витькой кричали и протягивали мне руки. Я встал на подножку. Мама шла рядом, подняв ко мне лицо. Из-под кепи выбивались влажные седые волосы, и по вискам текли струйки пота. Мама начала отставать, вагон выкатился из-под вокзального навеса на солнце, мама шла и смотрела на меня и к концу перрона вышла впереди всех. Я помню маму на конце перрона в ее черных туфлях с перепонками, в канареечного цвета носках и длинной юбке. Ноги у мамы были как мраморные: белые в синих прожилках. Больше я маму никогда не видел, даже мертвой…" 

Это книга про жизнь. Повесть очень короткая, прочитайте, а потом посмотрите фильм с молодыми Евгением Стебловым, Михаилом Кононовым и Николаем Досталем, тем самым известным теперь кинорежиссером ("Облако-рай"), с прекрасной операторской работой, которая в наше время отправила бы этот фильм по европейским фестивалям, а в Советском Союзе фильм был запрещен из-за опального режиссера Михаила Калика.

Фильм, как и книга, светлый, лете, о юности, о море, но музыка... Музыка Микаэля Таривердиева, прекрасная печальная мелодия, пронизывающая весь фильм, не дает забыть о том, что будет.

"...когда подходишь к обрыву в черную пустоту, невольно оглядываешься назад. Кем я был? Эгоистом? Юнцом, не способным глубоко задуматься и чувствовать? Наверное, все это было. 

Я жил в городе, где много солнца над вечно изменчивой морской равниной. Рядом жила Инка и мои друзья. Я был уверен, что для меня уготованы все радости жизни...

...Я любил и часто повторял ленинские слова: коммунистом стать можно лишь тогда, когда обогатишь память всеми знаниями, которые выработало человечество. Я был в школе и везде, где учился потом, круглым отличником. И мне казалось, что этого вполне достаточно, что все остальное придет постепенно само собой, – главное быть отличником. Но теперь, наедине с собой, в долгие бессонные ночи, я понимаю, что знал очень мало. Я знал наизусть все ошибки Гегеля и Канта, не прочитав ни одного из них. 

Разумный мир, единственно достойный человека, был воплощен в стране, где я родился и жил. Вся остальная планета ждала освобождения от человеческих страданий. Я считал, что миссия освободителей ляжет на плечи мои и моих сверстников. Я готовился и ждал, когда пробьет мой час.

В пределах этого представления о мире – я думал. Самые сложные явления жизни я сводил к упрощенному понятию добра и зла. Я жил, принимая упрощения за непреложные истины. У меня было много разных обязанностей – мелких и крупных, но я не чувствовал их тяготы: все, что я делал, было для меня естественно, как дыхание. Все это, конечно, не что иное, как факты моей личной биографии. Не больше. Жизнь человека в своей индивидуальности не похожа одна на другую." 

Всё у них будет... До свидания, мальчики...



Copyright © 2014 by Olga Johannesson

Friday, 31 May 2013

"Pretty woman walking down the street..."

We live in a world of stereotypes - we are born into it and by that same fact of birth we acquire a predetermined inventory of characteristics. Then having absorbed with the mothers milk the core attributes of femininity or masculinity on a long road of maturity we are becoming more of what the society expects of us: "Aren't you a boy to be whining like a girl?", "You have to be clean and pretty - you are a girl!"

And, gradually, chiseled by everyday judgments we are shaped into what we have to be: pretty, clean, shy, weak, or strong, decisive, rugged and ambitious - you know, sort of blue or pink, skirts or trousers.

As a Russian woman ("pink", "modest", "timid", hmm... "pretty"? , "blushing", "with long hair", "coy" and "shamefaced" (whatever that means) living abroad I want to discuss intercultural gender misunderstandings that I faced being brought up "in a pink-bow-Russian way".
source of photo
In one famous and most revered Russian (Soviet) movies ever, which got most of the all possible prizes abroad - "Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears" - the plot is banal and as conventional as it can be: three simple girls came to Moscow from the province in search of a better life in the middle of the 60s. The obvious embodiment to a better life was a fortunate marriage which could establish a position of a woman and secure the rest of her life.

Consequently, in a rather archetypal and fairy-tale manner, one gets married to a simple worker, the second in an ongoing search of something better ends up alone having lost her quite a decent husband to alcoholism, and the third, having been knocked up by some ambitious charming scunk, after 15 years turns into a self-sufficient director of a huge and successful plant, sort of a self-made woman - bitter, cold and decisive single mother in well-made Soviet pants, spending her scanty free time with a married lover - quite a widely-spread and accomplished image these days.

The movie touches upon many issues (if you come across a version with English subtitles - as a winner of a Golden Bear in Berlin 1980 and an Oscar in 1981, it should most certainly exist in  English - I implore you - watch!), the main being the fate of a woman in a society.  

None of these women is happy without a man, the successful one being utterly unhappiest of all three. Envied by many, she confides into her friends: "Just don't tell your sons that when you get everything in life, the only thing you feel like doing is to howl as a lonely wolf" (- Только ты пока ребятам не рассказывай, что как раз когда всего добъешься в жизни, больше всего волком завыть хочется"). 

Until (of course - this movie got an Oscar) she meets the real man - sort of a Soviet Mr. Big - who sets the priorities right - "And by that remember: from now on, everyday, everything is decided only by me. With one simple reasoning that I am a man". (- А заодно запомни, что всё и всегда я буду решать сам. На том простом основании, что я - мужчина").

And what happens with that forty-year-old woman, the head of an enormous industrial enterprise in Moscow, the strong woman in man's pants? She weeps with happiness - I am not joking!

In a society like Russian, despite all the hard work of Clara Zetkin and Rosa Luxemburg, life, still in many respects, is organized around good old Domostroi (a 16th century book or a code of a patriarchal rules of family life), of course, changed and adopted by the compliments of the XXI century. But a woman - in a notion of a woman - is supposed to be pretty, skinny, well-dressed, high-heeled, red-lipsticked, long-and-polish-nailed, educated (preferably, but not to use it), smart (optionally), good cook, good mother, good friend, good (inventive) lover, strong, fit, and by all that - stand by the side of a man. Just a man. With no attribute.

All that, no doubt, made a Russian woman a proverbial model wife all over the world with no obvious realization and acknowledgment from her side. Because we are brought up this way, we find nothing special in being a woman.

When my moderately handsome boyfriend, back then, was visiting me in Russia, I found it so rude that even stopped speaking to him for 30 minutes or so, after he left the bus ahead of me without offering me a hand. Then, this uncultured (so I thought) schmuck went through every door in a city first, never waited for me to take my place in a taxi, never offered (of course I would have declined gracefully, but still) pay a bill in a coffee shop. Never. never, never. So that eventually my inner lady-in-pink felt so cheap and neglected that I even considered an immediate break up.

Now it seems like charming memories from the past. But still the difference exists. We are, in our personal imaginative way, princesses in an ebony tower waiting for our knight in a shining armor (preferably on a white horse, produced in Germany). Even if we never admit it.  

And we let them think we are a bit stupid, naive and weak because...
we are not.


Copyright © 2013 by Olga Johannesson

Thursday, 9 May 2013

On the Victory Day: Iceland which helped us live

If I were to write something, anything about war what would it be? What do we, people, born and brought up as remote from war as possible know about it? Movies, photographs, stories, chronicles, memoirs can give a general picture, but hardly any real understanding, any realization of the proportions of every human's tragedy involved. 

War is not only about heroism and deaths on the battlefield, it's just as well about a life of a child born in the hot summer of 1941, it's about the whole life of a mother who lost her toddler in the bombed train, it's about every day of a wife who is waiting for her husband, of a mother who still hopes for her son to return, waiting through deaths of children and hunger. 


Year after year somehow I find more and more details about the World War II. Having moved to Iceland,  I discovered Hvalfjörður - a birthplace for at least ten Arctic convoys, seven from which ended in my native city of Arkhangelsk between 1941-1942, bringing food and supplies, giving hope and saving our lives. 
on the photo - the most famous and tragic Arctic convoy PQ-17 is being assembled in Hvalförður

It's a Victory Day in Russia today - on the 8th of May, 1941, the World War II officially ended, as Field-Marshal Keitel signed Wehrmacht capitulation papers in Berlin. Interestingly, due to the time difference, it was already the 9th of May in Moscow, since then we keep this date to remember.

World War II is a huge historical field in terms of topics, actions, direction, events, places, people, etc. Arctic convoys is one of them, undoubtedly, influential for the whole course of events. More importantly for me, as it has always been tightly connected with my native city, and now as I have found out, with my new homeland. 

A lot has been researched and written about Arctic convoys, but just to make a small picture:  in the period between August 1941 to May 1945 there were 78 convoys, sailing from the United Kingdom, Iceland and North America to the two most northern ports of the Soviet Union: Arkhangelsk and Murmansk. 

Let respected historians forgive me for the small possible inaccuracies, but as far as most of sources state in 1941-1942 fourteen convoys started from Iceland: ten from Hvalfjörður and four from Reykjavík. Seven out of ten coming out from Hvalfjörður ended in Arkhangelsk. The importance of them is difficult to underestimate: a complete new vein brought blood to the dying, exhausted heart of the country, reviving the huge organism for the victorious fight. The great value of the convoys was not only in terms of supplies or food, but in terms of hope - suddenly the victory seemed closer, possible, soon.

Every year Arkhangelsk becomes a meeting place for those who survived, sadly, less and less of them with every year. Every year we, children, were in the streets to look at those old dignified foreigners, who seemed strangely alike our grandfathers, walking side by side with them; every year, we, students of the language department, were volunteering with translation; every year, marveling at their courage, theirs and our grandfathers´ feat, which gave us possibility to live. We grew up with the knowledge of the convoys, but somehow to my shame Iceland literally has never ranged the ship bell in our heads.

Last year a couple of my very good friends were visiting Iceland. On the road from Borgarnes, approaching the tunnel, my friend asked about convoys. The answer of my moderately handsome husband took me by surprise as he mentioned Hvalfjörður which we were passing by at that moment. How come this peaceful, most breathtakingly beautiful place on Earth was involved in the war. How come there is a direct link between this place and my home. How come the lives of my parents, my life and the lives of my children depended on this particular part of the world. How come I didn't know...

The war, the end of which Russia celebrates today, is exceptionally multifaceted and manifold. There's hardly a person in Russia who has never been touched by it. And it still echoes to us - through the other times, through the other places.

At this moment I want to thank Icelanders who helped us live.

beautiful and peaceful Hvalfjörður almost 70 years later
source of photo



Copyright © 2013 by Olga Johannesson

Sunday, 5 May 2013

Christ has risen!

On the holy day of the Orthodox Easter, Sunday, 5 May, indeed as the situation required, I thought of God. Then I thought of the seventy years of the soviet times when the Mighty Position had been secured by Vladimir Lenin with a twenty-year interim intermission of the ever more almighty, loving and punishing - Stalin.
Thinking back into the history, Russians have always had an extremely grievous and hard relationship with God, which, combined with the inherent mysticism and fatalism as parts of the national character, engraved religious traits even on the all-negating stoned stance of the atheists. 
 


In the Orthodox religious tradition the icons - the depictions of God and the saints - were present in every house. According to the rule they were positioned in the so-called "red corner"  ("red" in the old Russian language meaning "beautiful", "honorary" - c.f. the Red Square). The icons were supposed to be in the Eastern corner of the house, as praying, sending our thoughts and talking to God we face the appearance of the sun and, thus, symbolically greet the Advent.

In the Soviet years religion becomes quite a dangerous puppet in the hands of the master - just think what a believer may do for the God. Some clever man, unfortunately the history keeps his name a secret, offered - no, no, not just to abolish God - that would be impossible for the country where religion was so tightly intertwined with the everyday life - but to replace Him. And who comes into the picture?

The decision was exceptionally smart and worked for many decades. Even the honorary red corner was kept to fit yet another deity.

The portraits of Lenin were adorning the walls of every institution, every establishment, every official room, on a frequent occasion enforced by the bronze or gypsum busts, the honest and strong look coming from the different sizes. The Bible, the Testaments and the Gospels were banned, instead we were given the Stories of Lenin - now I cannot tell what part of truth was there, but looking back I realize how much of a hagiography or menology (the lives of the saints) it reminded of and certainly served the purpose well. There was even a children's version of the Acts with pictures - just like Noah's Arch story.

Interestingly, the religious rituals were still kept going - we baptized children, painted eggs for Easter. But the pure religious meaning of them was a bit tarnished - baptism, for example, started to bear more of a pagan belief of the holy water protecting a child from the illnesses. Still, most of the children were baptized - secretly, at home, by an isolated priest. Consequently, we even had a mummified deity (whose remains are still by the way kept uncommitted to earth in the Red Square, the spirit haunting economy and politics - so far the only obvious, undeniable, unquestionable explanation of the ongoing Russian misfortunes), a religious doctrine - a successful mold of communism and spiritism, a set of rituals - books, learnings, common meetings, portraits -"icons", in other words, even when we didn't have it, we had it all.

Nowadays, the busts are on the dump, the pictures faded in the cellars. With the life so cruel and grim, fiercely grinding people by its millstones, people are seeking for the alleviation and looking for God once again...

In Russia on the holy day of Easter we greet each other with the traditional words: "Christ has risen!" and for many He has finally risen indeed.




Copyright © 2013 by Olga Johannesson

Saturday, 13 April 2013

One girl, one island

"The greatest is best seen from the distance" - once and quite rightly a famous Russian poet said. Last week my very good friend from quite distanced Russia was visiting Iceland for the first time in her life. Being quite an experienced traveler and having seen most of Europe and beyond, she shared her thoughts and impressions about Iceland before and after. 

...most of all I was impressed by the nature - unique, virgin, untouched and severe. I have seen Gullfoss, Geysir, all the touristic routes, I was hiking in the mountains, but the most beautifully striking place for me became Reykjanesviti. I never thought there are places so completely remote and secluded in this world, where one simply unites with the nature.

...in Russia we deprive ourselves of many things, including a simple smile. Icelanders struck me as very friendly nation, in a narrow street a complete strangers will greet you.

...people take pride that they are Icelanders. The country itself has a rather limited history compared to Russia or other big European nations; it had less than a million of population in all its history, and, nonetheless, Icelanders take pride in the smallest detail, which could easily have been left unnoticed. People take pride in the place they were born.

...the thing which struck me most was that this is a society which is fundamentally different not only from Russians, but more or less from the Europeans in general. This is a small society, everyone knows each other, the telephone book is organized by the first names, and they treat each other as one big family, where everyone is a relative - and they actually are. Even the language, as we know, reflecting the realities of life, devised a word, which defines male relatives frændi and female relatives frænka, not to go into detail of cousins, nephews, nieces, uncles and so on - it is just one family.

...I have to mention the language and the concept of Linguistic Purism in Iceland. Many countries have the policy of preserving their language, but in Iceland they have special list of the Icelandic names, which you can name a child, anything else has to be approved by a special linguistic committee. Once again, they value their heritage and identity.

...and everyone speaks English. France, for example, has the policy of protecting the language as well, they also create French equivalents for the new words. At that people learn and speak English very reluctantly. Icelanders are not afraid to go beyond - to enter globalization and keep their national identity.

...I was also surprised by rather high social standards of living in Iceland. Maybe because we have a stereotype of  well-off Norway and hardly expect anything of a small nation in the North Atlantic.

...feminism is obviously not a bad issue, especially in Iceland. In Russia a man considers it beyond his self-esteem to help the woman with cooking and with a baby. Probably it is not even the fault of men, as women themselves consider proper to work, make career, and take care of the family, children, cooking and a husband. A man has to work and make money, a woman stays at home. It was very surprising to see otherwise.

...the same as the baby in the family: in Russia when a child is born a mother falls out of life for 2-3 years completely: no parties, no friends, no travel. Here life just goes on and the quality of life doesn't change much.

...the concept of Icelandic family with many marriages, all kinds of spouses, kids from all sides is another point of astonishment - it is so far out of the Russian culture. We are more traditional - of course infidelity happens and rather often these days, but men very rarely leave families. The ones which do keep hardly any contact with their children.

...Reykjavik struck me as having rather plain architecture - simple and unsophisticated. Reykjavik can not be compared with French, Italian or most of European cities, where "every stone breathes history", or even with St. Petersburg, where every house is an architectural masterpiece. Here houses are simple, plain, primitive and functional. But it goes together with the nature: severe, minimalistic, plain.

...my perception of the museums is defined by the Russian museums - you have to spend days in the Tretyakov Gallery, weeks in the Hermitage. Once again we are so proud we have so much to show, that we drown foreigners in our culture. Here, the National Museum of Iceland is fascinating in combination of simplicity, functionality, importance and interest it arises and the questions it answers. The paradox is - there's no La Gioconda in Þjóðminjsafn, but still it is the one of most interesting museums I have ever visited.     

...Russians know very little about Iceland. Of course it depends on the education but in general many people hardly make any difference between Iceland, Ireland or Greenland. Of course, they realise these are completely different countries, but in conceptual understanding "it is all somewhere there". The stereotypes include: volcano in 2010, snow and Bjork - her last name is not possible to pronounce even by people with the linguistic education. The older generation know Reykjavik as the meeting place of Gorbachev and Reagan.

...Icelanders are very active. There's a lot to do: hiking, swimming, horse-riding, music, skiing, even dancing tango. One of the paradoxes for me was that skating rinks are indoor, swimming pools are outdoor. This is shocking to me, but when I mentioned this to Icelanders, they were completely surprised, explaining that it would be too cold to skate outside.

...Icelanders take life easy and it is shown in everything. Hiking in the mountains may be quite a dangerous thing but people just go. Children are not over-treated with medicine, massages and over-care and running naked in frost and wind in the outdoor swimming-pools. Museums are not overloaded with information, but simply showing the life itself. And I can go on with many examples.

...to me Iceland is a country where Scandinavian minimalism and functionality genuinely combine with breathtaking severe beauty of the nature, easy-going and warm attitudes of Icelanders and all these make it truly unique land, a small polished piece of lava - a beautiful gem of the North Atlantic.


My dear friend went back to Russia leaving me alone with the thoughts of gratitude for this unique opportunity of being able to live in both countries, share both cultures, enjoy both worlds the difference of which is so sharply defined by the distance.



Copyright © 2013 by Olga Johannesson

Tuesday, 9 April 2013

And then he asked "Why?"

And then he asked "Why? Why do people long for the old times? Wasn't it just for the better that these turbulent 90s brought freedoms of all sorts, democracy, goods to the shops, money to the wallet, free thinking, free press, new economy, private enterprises, private property, travel, the hoards of brokers, shoppers, marketologists, merchandisers, business advisers, analysts and agents with endless possibilities and what not...?" 
A shining fluorescent neon word "globalization" sparked above yet another "window to Europe" instantaneously finishing the decades of GULAGs, Stalin, oppression and stagnation. So, why haven't we just been jumping in the highest exaltation possible on this new glistening trampoline of freedoms since?

Then I started to feel that I owe an explanation.
source of the photo
My (moderately handsome) husband, having read the previous post and being a product of a completely different system, asked me this seemingly simple and logical question. The Western World for the decades of the Cold War and beyond was showing a dull, hungry and uneventful world of the Soviet State, where all of us were wearing ear-flapped grey hats with a red star on the forehead, marching in lines in the grey empty streets, eating cold potatoes with its grey skin - a sort of James Bond- or Schwarzenegger- movies with ludicrous and stupid military Russians and non-existing realia.

On the other side we were shown "the decaying capitalism", where poor decent people were dying in the streets under the cold and impersonal lights of advertisements.

Most interestingly, it worked. We were sympathizing chained Afro-Americans, exploited by the fat ugly millionaires in "that rotting America", so that even we - children - pioneers - were collecting our lunch money to send to them. And no one was stupid, no one was to blame: the propaganda worked well yet again.

History is a fickle mistress, who willingly changes its stories by the wish of the client: time, age, geography, events, attitudes, relationships, anything. I realize that, but having lived there I have the right to tell my story.

I was born in 1979 in the depth of the soviet stagnation (this story of a Russian girl could easily be mine, as well as of millions of other soviet children). These were the last years of Brezhnev and the General Secretaries started to fall like leaves on a windy day, being too old to rule for more than a couple of years, until Gorbachev started in 1985 and finished the Great Soviet Epoch as the first and the last President of the Soviet Union in 1991.

Understand me right - I do not thoughtlessly applaud to the good old days, but I certainly miss them. The life itself was simple, uncomplicated, non-criminal, non-chaotic, with no hatred, no fuss and stress, no unpredictability. In short, it was a strictly organized society built by a majority of simple uncomplicated honest people who worked all their lives.

Yes, we were deprived of the freedom of expression - everything had to be approved by special committees. Instead, we had free education, which was one of the best in the world, free kindergartens, free swimming pools, free after-school activities.
We were (relatively) deprived of the freedom of speech - we couldn't praise the life abroad or criticize Soviet routines. Still my father had self-made copies - the so-called samizdat - of the famous soviet exiles: Brodsky, Solzhenitsyn, Dovlatov.
We were short of the products in the shops. But the quality of what we had was impeccable - no chemistry in the food, no toxins in the plastic. Apples and oranges were always there with tangerines and bananas always for the New Year´s Eve, sometimes even with Pepsi.
We couldn't travel abroad. But the local flights were so cheap, my mother was taking planes from our city to Moscow going shoe shopping; we were regularly flying to the Black Sea resorts; people were coming to see us from Vladivostok. The countryside with villages and farming industry was flourishing.

I could go on with this list, but there's something which most of the Russians share today - a longing for the stability and safety - the most basic needs of a human.

Of course, it wasn't the best state in the world, as it was ringing in every song we were singing, but it was certainly the state where its people shared kindness, compassion, honesty, hard work and eternal humane values, most of which are conveniently forgotten now.

So we didn't have a freedom of speech... but we were happy and, therefore, free.







links with photos about the soviet times which you may find interesting to see:
http://offline.by/o-nashem-detstve-v-sovetskom-soyuze/
http://offline.by/interesnoe-puteshestvie-v-istoriyu-sovetskogo-soyuza/
http://offline.by/razval-sovetskogo-soyuza/
http://offline.by/deti-sssr/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHW0zL9dSMM


Copyright © 2013 by Olga Johannesson

Saturday, 30 March 2013

Magnificent. Depressing. Ugly. Most Beautiful - all rolled into one

Yesterday a two-minute reference to the social situation in Greenland in a Danish popular series pushed me into thinking about the present-day Russia.

In the above-mentioned episode a Danish Prime Minister was visiting Greenland following a US-influenced internal conflict. After some emotional conversations Greenlandic Premier took the representative of a dominion oppressor to face the evidence of the indelible political wrongs accumulated by centuries by meeting Greenlanders. On the background of the benumbed and frosted graveyard stubbed by numerous white impersonal crosses on the most breathtaking landscape of snowy and mountainous Greenland, the following conversation evolved:

"Our biggest problem that we are going to die out as people. The birth rate is dropping. Our young people leave Greenland. But the worst thing is skyrocketing suicide rate - all the young men are killing themselves."

"What have you done about it?"

"We have tried almost everything: suicide hotlines, psychologists, anti-depressants, but it's just getting worse. 20% of Greenlandic youths have tried to commit suicide. It's a tragic world record." 

"Why is this, do you think?" 

"Suicide have always been a part of our culture. People threw themselves off a mountain, which was called "the place where you fall down". But they were old people who had become a burden to their families. Back then a suicide was an act of pride. Maybe our young commit suicide because they take pride in nothing. Why do Greenlanders drink? Why our children are abused? People have forgotten who they are." 

Right there, thunderstruck by these words my mind instantaneously beamed out a parallel to the realities of my life:

In Russia, the turbulent 90s swept away seventy years of stability and unyielding routines with the last decades of pure stagnation. If we think of the country and political decisions in terms of its people, one can easily imagine what a personal catastrophe of enormous proportions almost everyone was undergoing: my grandmother, my parents, we, children at that time, who could not understand why mother was taking heart drops and father was lying in bed for days.

Now my grandmother warmly remembers the hardest years of her life, which include no less than famine, war and the death of children. My parents, as well as the whole generation at the time being in their forties, have never really adapted and recovered in their new life. As a child I spent all my free time outside, running and playing in the streets of a big city, nowadays very few parents will let their children or even teenagers out alone after six.

The birth and death rates have just broke even in 2012 after plummeting down for years, the average life expectancy is 67 years: 76 for women and 63 for men. Almost world's lowest population growth. Almost all of my students left to the capitals or abroad after their graduation. "But the worst is the skyrocketing suicide rate - the young people are killing themselves" - just to rephrase the Greenlandic fictional character's grave words. I am not mentioning alcoholism, drugs and abuse just to keep a live analogy.

The change as rapid and fast could not fail to provoke fatal repercussions, damaging the whole generation, which could not withstand its magnitude and force, irreversibly changing the future of once a great country. Therefore, we are where we are: old values have been washed away, the new valor impositus and freedoms have grown as mutants. Hence, drugs, drinking, abuse, mortality, suicides, in other words: "we take pride in nothing, we have forgotten who we are".

As I was watching the episode on, the hope glimpsed for a short moment:

"I have a plan for my country. If I am to succeed, we must give our people back their self-respect. I want suicide rate to drop. Let Greenlanders have a say in the major issues." 

"Political security matters and foreign affairs?"

"But you cannot let us, can you?"... 

...

When the Danish PM returned home, she talked to her husband:

"How was Greenland?" 

"It was magnificent. It was depressing  Ugly. I think it's the most beautiful place I have ever seen. All rolled into one." 

And within that brief moment I realised - that's exactly how I feel about my country: Magnificent. Depressing. Ugly. Most Beautiful - all rolled into one.


Wednesday, 13 March 2013

Hi, I am Olga and I am a barbarian!

This Friday, the 8th of March, in the northern Russian city of Arkhangelsk, an atrocity of the prehistoric range happened in the open daylight as a pack of stray dogs tore apart to death a 7-year-old boy.
(for the Russians and other interested here's the link to the news).
    Source of photo
The boy was torn apart in minutes, as witnesses (obviously standing and watching, but who would easily dive into a hellball of swirling mad dogs, and a screaming little fellow, really, guys?) claim, the head was bitten out, the ambulance, which came later, had nothing more to do as to pick up together the blooded remains from the ground. The dogs disappeared. And, oh, Dear God Almighty, I have not made this story up.

Being a long-time dog-lover and having been following the news ever since it happened, I still cannot decide what I am shocked by the most: by the fact of an unbelievably monstrous, brute and nonsensical death of a child, by the horrors which actually happen on the streets of a more-or-less european city in the broad daylight, by the fact that it actually happened in the twenty-first century, by fact that the animals are still in the open, by the reaction of the witnesses, by the reaction of the authorities, by the reaction of the people, or by the mentality of my tribe in general.

For several days by now the discussion has been going on, and the dogs are still there, only two of them having been found and shot. As the mayor still sleeps peacefully undisturbed by the events, the society divides now into radicals and more radicals, who now raid the streets with air guns and deadly rat poisons, giving no chance to any animal, dog, cat, rat or armadillo, if they find any. Add up here slightly and not-so-slightly mentally disturbed people and possible dangers coming from them holding guns and rat poisons. Add up also numerous wounded dogs and dogs dying from the poison in the worst possible agony, hiding their corpses which no one attends. On the other side of the trench there are poor bullied animal protectors, who, within a night, have become the scapegoats.

A bit more educated people have dipped themselves into homey coziness of the vasts of the Internet and deliver aggressive or not-so-aggressive comments into the Universe, taking part in numerous polls and voting for "taking poor animals into the animal shelter".
Here, I would like to make a small diversion: of course there is a dog shelter in a 300 thousand city. The shelter with 180 dogs (currently) is going on despite everything due to the persistence and good-will of several volunteers. Minimally it costs 150 rubles (5 USD) per dog per day, and it is not financed by the city at all. On the other hand, there is no proper service for capturing stray animals as well. No one wants to take a stray home, very few want to seem brutal and unfair to the animals. So we have a full circle and an eaten boy.

And I am no better - in the homely Internet, typing out my shock of what has happened and the frustration of why it has happened. Why there are so many stray animals in my city and in every city in my country? Why we learned to brush teeth in the morning and use the toilet, but not to take the responsibility for an animal? Why is it possible that teenagers put a fireworks detonator into the dogs muzzle and blow it "just to see what happens"? Or burn a kitten, or throw the dog from the top floor onto the tarmac? What has gone wrong with people? Why no one is responsible for the death of a child?

It is deeply sad and hurtful to write all this about my people. Or we are just a tribe and under the cover of the night we all have become barbarians...



Copyright © 2013 by Olga Johannesson